Child Hierarchy – In Order of Importance

| April 15, 2009 | 3 Comments

polaroid with child hierachy This week Emily ponders whether you can avoid the hierarchy that affects how you celebrate and commemorate each of your children…

As a child I loved flicking through my parent’s photo albums; laughing at the fashions of the sixties and marvelling at the wallpaper of the seventies. There were literally hundreds of snaps of a smiling baby dressed in orange and brown velour; my older sister, captured laughing, crying, eating, crayoning, dancing… Four years on, and photos of my own chubby cheeks are few and far between. My younger sister, born another four years after me, barely features at all.

I had imagined this wilful neglect to be peculiar to my own parents, and deeply resented the lack of interest in photographing my childhood. I now realise it is a trait common to many parents of several children and, as I glance through my own albums, I realise with shame that I have fallen into the same trap. My toddler is depicted from every angle, occupied by every conceivable activity and modelling a vast array of clothing. Photos of his sisters appear in bursts; dozens of pictures taken on one day, when I remember to dig out the camera and record the moment for posterity. This sporadic shooting is evident from the rapid growth evident between each batch of pictures, and the effect is not disimilar to flicking through a picture book out of which someone has ripped random pages, forcing the reader to jump forward several scenes at a time.

As my children grow it becomes ever clear to me how sibling hierarchy evolves; why first children are confident and independent, middle-children confused and resentful, youngest children slow to fly the nest. Not sixteen months when his sisters arrived, the Toddler was pushed to grow up, and expected to set an example when really he was just a baby himself. Already he appears older and more confident than those of his peers who have yet to acquire siblings. The age gap between his sisters is less text-book, however the seventeen minutes which give Twin One her senority status will no doubt be used to good effect when deciding who gets the top bunk on future holidays.

One is bossy, loud and demanding, constantly striving for attention and desperately jealous of her big brother. Two is sweet, gentle, quiet and kind, putting up with being ignored in favour of her more needy siblings. Once at a toddler group I accidentally left without her, and had to pretend I was putting the other two in the buggy before coming back for her and planting remorseful kisses on her accepting cheeks.

I wonder if one can fight against sibling hierarchy, or if it is pre-determined like the order of your birth? If I deliberately give less attention to One, treat the Toddler like a baby and force Two to stand on her own two feet, will the status quo be reversed? And yet I can’t imagine doing that; already their characters are so entrenched, their position within the family so well-held. Something I can change though – something I WILL change – is the practical, tangible after-effects of sibling hierarchy.

I WILL fill out their baby books with the same dedication and accuracy with which I completed the Toddlers (‘started walking around your first birthday’ is simply not the same as ‘took your first steps towards Mummy on Boxing Day 2006, recorded for posterity on DVD, Video and Blue Ray’). I WILL take hundreds of photos of activities which may well have lost some novelty value for me right now, but which I will treasure when my girls are all grown up and I’m groping for the memory of the first time they fed themselves yoghurt. And beyond all of this, I will never ever have favourites. Well, not ones I admit to, anyway…

Emily Carlisle is a freelance writer living in the Cotswolds with her husband and three small children. You can read her take on extreme parenting at More Than Just a Mother.

Related Posts

Tags: , ,

Category: Multiple Parenthood

About the Author ()

Comments (3)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. That’s actually one of my biggest concerns about having another baby; whether I will be able to give them both equal attention and an equal start. And, frankly, I don’t think it’s possible to treat them exactly the same; as you say, their characters will determine how you treatthem to a large extent. And, presumably, we learn from the mistakes we make the first time round and correct them.

    So, in our case, Baby Number 2 will probably never be fed to sleep; instead they will be put down to fall asleep on their own, so they know from a young age how to do so. Well, probably. Baby Number 2 will probably be allowed to be taken out for a push round the park by someone who isn’t me from the age of a week, rather than six months. And, of course, Baby Number 2 will have a big sister to (hopefully) guide them through the milestones of the early years or (probably) try to hamper their little steps toward toddlerdom. There is no way I’ll be able to treat Baby Number 2 the same as I did Rosemary.

    But, in light of your post, I think I will ask for a good new camera for my birthday, so we can at least aim for photographic equality. And I’ll rejuvenate Rosemary’s blog, so her sibling’s early toilet and sleeping habits can be recorded in equally agonising detail and brought out to show future spouses to make them both cringe.

  2. Laura Driver says:

    *hangs head in shame*

    We have a whole album dedicated to the 4 years olds first year. Both the 3 and 4 year old like to sit and look at it.

    Any photos of the 3 year old at the same stage are still on the PC.

    Once a month I get a pang of guilt and think I really must send those off for printing, 5 minutes later I forget or get sidetracked.

    I don’t love him any less, I just had and still have less time.

  3. Iota says:

    I don’t know. I always see it from the other angle. The oldest has the huge pressure of parental expectation to bear. As a baby/toddler, he is constantly watched, prodded, poked, assessed, worried over, shown off, experimented upon. He is likely to grow up anxious to please, a worrier, a perfectionist. They have to do everything first. Subsequent children have freedom, an accessible role model, someone to hide behind, relaxed parents. They never have to learn that they aren’t, after all, the centre of the universe, which can be a hard lesson for an oldest. Sharing might still be a difficult thing, but at least the concept isn’t a totally alien and inexplicable one, because they know about it from day one. They get away with not eating up every morsel of healthy food, they have far more in the way of sweeties, ice cream, dessert etc, they are introduced to more interesting toys, place, tv programmes, you name it, from an early age. I see the oldest at a disadvantage (I was third out of four, and never ever wanted to be higher up).

    What makes us think that parental attention is the be all and end all?

Leave a Reply